Note Dr documents every mucosal review the same way, so the lesion you watch and the biopsy you took read as one continuous record, ready to approve.
Get Note Dr free→Trusted from single surgeries to national dental groups
Note Dr listens to the consultation as it happens. While you examine the mucosa and talk through a chronic diagnosis, it writes the record in the background, so an anxious patient gets you, not the top of your head over a keyboard.
Lesion described the same way every visit
Site, size and character recorded consistently, so a change in a potentially malignant lesion is visible, not lost between clinicians.
Biopsy and histology decisions evidenced
Why you sampled, what you sent and how the histology was acted on, captured at the time rather than reconstructed.
Urgent referral and safety-netting logged
The suspicious finding, the urgent suspected-cancer referral and the advice you gave, on record exactly as it happened.
A reviewed Note Dr record captures more of what a record needs to stand up to scrutiny, examination, findings, surveillance and consent, where published audits show conventional records routinely fall short.
Audits referenced: Cole & McMichael (Primary Dental Care, 2009), Hayes et al (Dental Update, 2017) and, on radiograph evaluation under IR(ME)R, a hospital audit (Kiu et al, Clinical Radiology, 2010).
Ask what was found last time, how the lesion has changed, or what the patient consented to, answered in seconds from their own record.
Walk into the review already knowing the story, without trawling the notes.
On a suspicious lesion, an oral lichen planus flare or a dry-mouth work-up, Note Dr surfaces the relevant published guidance and its source, the NICE suspected-cancer referral criteria, oral medicine society guidance on potentially malignant disorders and the evidence on topical corticosteroids, so the standard is to hand. It never tells you how to treat your patient; that judgement stays with you.
Want me to surface any guidance for this? You could ask:
Why oral medicine specialists trust Note Dr with a record that stands up to scrutiny.
★★★★★
My lesion descriptions are consistent now
Surveillance lives or dies on describing a lesion the same way every visit. Note Dr captures site, extent and character exactly as I say them, and the transcription is spot on. I edit and approve in seconds and my reviews are finally comparable over time.
★★★★★
Shared-care letters write themselves
So much of my work is shared care with medicine and dermatology. The consultation note is done before the patient leaves, and the letter to the referring team and the GP almost writes itself from it.
★★★★★
My patients get my full attention
Many of my patients are anxious about a chronic diagnosis. I am not hunched over a keyboard any more, they get me, and the record is still complete. It has genuinely changed how my consultations feel.
★★★★★
The biopsy decision is always justified
Why I sampled, what I sent and how I acted on the histology is logged as I go. When a dysplasia case is reviewed later, the reasoning reads exactly as it should rather than being pieced together from memory.
★★★★★
An urgent referral I can account for
When a lesion looks suspicious, the finding, the urgent suspected-cancer referral and the safety-netting advice are all on record at the time. I never have to wonder later whether the trail is complete.
Every recording and record is protected by strong, independently assessed security and encryption.
★★★★★
For the first time my surveillance reads as one continuous story: the lesion mapped the same way each visit, the biopsy justified, the shared-care plan there in full. I would be completely comfortable defending any of these records.
Dr Gwendolyn ROral medicine specialist
A mucosal lesion record should describe the lesion the same way each visit: site, size, colour, surface and borders, any induration, and the patient's symptoms, alongside a provisional diagnosis and a photograph for comparison. Note Dr drafts each from your examination, mapped against the last visit, so a potentially malignant disorder is tracked for you to review and approve.
An AI scribe's notes can be acceptable for GDC record-keeping when the clinician reviews and approves each one, because the record remains the clinician's own responsibility whoever drafts it. Note Dr drafts the note; the oral medicine specialist edits and approves it before it enters the record. It documents but never diagnoses, prescribes or replaces your clinical judgement.
Note Dr suits a secondary-care oral medicine clinic, drafting new-patient assessments, mucosal reviews, biopsy records and clinic letters to the referring dentist, GP or medical team from the consultation. Because it ties into no single hospital system, you paste or export the approved note into whatever record your dental hospital uses, so you stay in control of the final entry.
A dry-mouth work-up is documented from history and examination through to investigations and shared care: reduced unstimulated salivary flow, the effect on eating and sleep, autoantibody testing for anti-Ro and anti-La, raised caries risk and any rheumatology liaison. Note Dr drafts each of these as you work, so a Sjögren's assessment reads as one continuous record for you to review and approve.
Note Dr captures the indication for the biopsy, the consent and risks you explained, the site sampled and what was sent, then the histology result and your follow-up decision, whether continued surveillance or referral to a multidisciplinary meeting, all on the one longitudinal record.
Yes. Because the consultation note is complete before the patient leaves, the clinic letter to the referring team, the GP, dermatology or rheumatology drafts straight from it, summarising the findings, the plan and any medication liaison in your own words for you to approve.
Yes. When a lesion looks suspicious, Note Dr logs the finding, the urgent suspected-cancer referral you made and the safety-netting advice you gave, contemporaneously, so the decision and the trail behind it are documented exactly as they happened.